by Christopher Lloyd-Spencer and the Team of the Korneelian Bloggers.
In this case I will follow the paradigm of the Kramaretta. According to the theory of medicine developed by them, the body exerts operative controls that work as satisfiers of the overall development. There are 5,250 satisfiers to be met. They all operate in conjunction to each other, and any malnutrification of at least one of the satisfiers may produce upheaval, that is eventually, illness.
More on this subject soon...
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Recovering from illness
by Christopher Lloyd-Spencer and the Team of the Korneelian Bloggers.
I wish to thank all of my friends for their kind support and evidence during my latest health adventure. Primarily, I wish to thank my family and especially the Korneellians for their warm support and continuous care.
I've been absent for almost two weeks, as yet all this period of time I felt that whatever happened to me was just another adventure, an actual opportunity to learn and adapt to new realities.
Thank you people from the bottom of heart and the superfluity of my mind!
I wish to thank all of my friends for their kind support and evidence during my latest health adventure. Primarily, I wish to thank my family and especially the Korneellians for their warm support and continuous care.
I've been absent for almost two weeks, as yet all this period of time I felt that whatever happened to me was just another adventure, an actual opportunity to learn and adapt to new realities.
Thank you people from the bottom of heart and the superfluity of my mind!
Saturday, December 27, 2008
Problems of Technognossy: Technognossy in a Mess, Part #1
by Christopher Lloyd-Spencer and the Team of the Korneelian Bloggers.
I've been asked by many of you what is the level of technognossy available to humans. The answer is quite dire and disappointing.
For example Pharmacognossy receives a 5.689372 score while the Headons score 3,983,476.028094. Software engineering: in this case the results are truly disappointing while we humans score of 7.340001 while the Cormascarridoll rate for an astonishing 983,760,342.092483. Next comes medicine, and the rule of the antibiotics. We humans know 0.000000, (yes 0.000000, which means nothing) while the Remerveli score the highest score that is 95,532.863372.
But that is not even the worse of all. Another dimension befrightens the whole edifice of knowledge of the human species and that is the fact the overall progress on the holistic level of producing new knowledge stalls. To this event, we experience a vital neopoverty in managing and developing new knowledge even to the extend that the overall progress score is negative! (it is -5.32%, that is on an annual basis, year to year, the knowledge produced for the year 2007 is contracting by 5.32%).
More on the issue of neopoverty of knowledge soon...
I've been asked by many of you what is the level of technognossy available to humans. The answer is quite dire and disappointing.
For example Pharmacognossy receives a 5.689372 score while the Headons score 3,983,476.028094. Software engineering: in this case the results are truly disappointing while we humans score of 7.340001 while the Cormascarridoll rate for an astonishing 983,760,342.092483. Next comes medicine, and the rule of the antibiotics. We humans know 0.000000, (yes 0.000000, which means nothing) while the Remerveli score the highest score that is 95,532.863372.
But that is not even the worse of all. Another dimension befrightens the whole edifice of knowledge of the human species and that is the fact the overall progress on the holistic level of producing new knowledge stalls. To this event, we experience a vital neopoverty in managing and developing new knowledge even to the extend that the overall progress score is negative! (it is -5.32%, that is on an annual basis, year to year, the knowledge produced for the year 2007 is contracting by 5.32%).
More on the issue of neopoverty of knowledge soon...
Problems of Technology: Technologies in Disarray, Part #1
by Christopher Lloyd-Spencer and the Team of the Korneelian Bloggers.
How far efficient are our technologies. Why all these bugs and problems and real adventures in the case of computer software? Why are we unable to provide for finalized formats of our software, omitting the perilous and problematic situation where we have to upgrade to the latest version?
According to the Society of the Ferrons, software made by humans fails to become finalizably effective by a remorseful score of 295,032 units. Typical software produced by extraterrestrials such as the Vigons or the Kannibati scores around 5 to 7 units of erroneous command. Further, 65% of all software produced by extraterrestrials that deem to follow the practices of the Planetary Command for the year 1992, scored as low as 2 units. A magnanimous 27% scored exactly 0.
Think twice before you most regretfully come to claim that human software is great. It is lowsy. So what can we do? Obviously, to reembark in an new era were softare will make sense because it is ready for any type of usage, even to the extreme one.
How far efficient are our technologies. Why all these bugs and problems and real adventures in the case of computer software? Why are we unable to provide for finalized formats of our software, omitting the perilous and problematic situation where we have to upgrade to the latest version?
According to the Society of the Ferrons, software made by humans fails to become finalizably effective by a remorseful score of 295,032 units. Typical software produced by extraterrestrials such as the Vigons or the Kannibati scores around 5 to 7 units of erroneous command. Further, 65% of all software produced by extraterrestrials that deem to follow the practices of the Planetary Command for the year 1992, scored as low as 2 units. A magnanimous 27% scored exactly 0.
Think twice before you most regretfully come to claim that human software is great. It is lowsy. So what can we do? Obviously, to reembark in an new era were softare will make sense because it is ready for any type of usage, even to the extreme one.
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
They are here! And they have some problem with us
by Christopher Lloyd-Spencer and the Team of the Korneelian Bloggers. Assisted by the Order of the Phoenix, Atlanta, Georgia, Mondrouitte Reaspott of the Felgonns, Japan, Ebolai Thietinn of Sovergorts, U.S.A., Darryle Marcofouiti of Spinsoms, U.S.A. and Marina Satyraa, Athens, Greece.
Some crisis! The worst in decades. In its own facts, the worst of all. But is it a crisis that permeates only our edifice or is there more to it?
Most of us don't know it, but the facts of this crisis are astonishing as they ramify an infinite number of civilizations in the proximity and the far echelons of our universe. And the way these people react to it isn't quite decorative for the relations of humans with these people. I would say clearly, that the climate is progressively decaying, making any communication with them problematic.
Do they want to take revenge on us? Certainly yes, but why and I say WHY do they not proceed in taking active measures against us? The answer is simple: we are a special kind of species that deems to be protected in order to transform to its next kind of form in a consistent manner. Any violation of this rule can cause more upheaval, more conflict, and more of a catastrophy, turning the end result into a reality that noone wishes to deal upon and make sufficient markings in its course.
I will come back to this subject in a later stage after I receive the formal assistence of the Order of the Sabbah. These people really know their subject well and can provide for answers into critical questions around this harsch reality.
Some crisis! The worst in decades. In its own facts, the worst of all. But is it a crisis that permeates only our edifice or is there more to it?
Most of us don't know it, but the facts of this crisis are astonishing as they ramify an infinite number of civilizations in the proximity and the far echelons of our universe. And the way these people react to it isn't quite decorative for the relations of humans with these people. I would say clearly, that the climate is progressively decaying, making any communication with them problematic.
Do they want to take revenge on us? Certainly yes, but why and I say WHY do they not proceed in taking active measures against us? The answer is simple: we are a special kind of species that deems to be protected in order to transform to its next kind of form in a consistent manner. Any violation of this rule can cause more upheaval, more conflict, and more of a catastrophy, turning the end result into a reality that noone wishes to deal upon and make sufficient markings in its course.
I will come back to this subject in a later stage after I receive the formal assistence of the Order of the Sabbah. These people really know their subject well and can provide for answers into critical questions around this harsch reality.
Monday, December 8, 2008
I know of a Secret, part #1
by Christopher Lloyd-Spencer and the Team of the Korneelian Bloggers. Assisted by Marcell Regoivoitte in Zurich, Milena Cross in Athens, Greece, Spyro Makariou in London, U.K., Despina Choleraki in Chania, Crete, and John Edwards-Margon@! in U.S.A.
It is no secret that humans err. In most of the cases the error can divest to have enormous proportions. Think what happened with Lehman Brothers, or better just ponder the situation with Citicorp. Almost $395b of irregular loans. It is amazing! But how all these perversive structures came to be and most of it, why do they make up of our reality?
According to the solvents of Formalytical Gnosiology, the error compounds. The error ramifies other errors. One single error can cost us several billions in dollars and to any extent one error can branch out to several structures, beyond of what we call immediate reality. Do we really understand how an error can function. Certainly not!
Been unable to ride a bicycle one can assume that there is an error. But if go further, not being able to conform with the idea of thousands of defaulting loans is a harch reality. The error ramifies on all of the reality systems of humans and mostly the ones that propagate happiness, that is the economic systems.
So what is the solution to this unadornable situation? Obviously there is only one solution out of this mess. To audit the decisions. To create audit trees for all our decisions. Who knows how to do it? All of us know, it is just that we avoid to do it based on the conviction that the error is a single entity that we can harness.
More on this subject will come soon with the assistance of Julious Rand from Spensingerdt Systems, Boston, U.S.A.
It is no secret that humans err. In most of the cases the error can divest to have enormous proportions. Think what happened with Lehman Brothers, or better just ponder the situation with Citicorp. Almost $395b of irregular loans. It is amazing! But how all these perversive structures came to be and most of it, why do they make up of our reality?
According to the solvents of Formalytical Gnosiology, the error compounds. The error ramifies other errors. One single error can cost us several billions in dollars and to any extent one error can branch out to several structures, beyond of what we call immediate reality. Do we really understand how an error can function. Certainly not!
Been unable to ride a bicycle one can assume that there is an error. But if go further, not being able to conform with the idea of thousands of defaulting loans is a harch reality. The error ramifies on all of the reality systems of humans and mostly the ones that propagate happiness, that is the economic systems.
So what is the solution to this unadornable situation? Obviously there is only one solution out of this mess. To audit the decisions. To create audit trees for all our decisions. Who knows how to do it? All of us know, it is just that we avoid to do it based on the conviction that the error is a single entity that we can harness.
More on this subject will come soon with the assistance of Julious Rand from Spensingerdt Systems, Boston, U.S.A.
How much we know (or rather how much we don't know) pt.#1
by Christopher Lloyd-Spencer and the Team of the Korneelian Bloggers. Assisted by John Erfors in Sweden, Mac Dectroix in France, and Melissa Gilbertz in Ohio, U.S.A.
I've been discussing the other day with colleagues about an important aspect of what it is called Human Genome Supported Gnosiology. According to what humans understand 30,000 to 45,000 genes play an important role in biology based decision making. As yet humans possess more genes, some to be exact range at around 67 trillion genes. Why all this piece of information is lost, and to be honest is it really lost?
The answer is quite simple. 4.5386 trillion of our genes play a role in the final decision making. The final number of decisions that one can get out of a biological system is 65 sextillion decisions, none of them being unique except from the morphal coders and the anatomical bisectors that tend to produce unique behaviors
Text Corrected by Annliss-Gessaouaoron Ertivelliss of Canister Systems, Sweden.
I've been discussing the other day with colleagues about an important aspect of what it is called Human Genome Supported Gnosiology. According to what humans understand 30,000 to 45,000 genes play an important role in biology based decision making. As yet humans possess more genes, some to be exact range at around 67 trillion genes. Why all this piece of information is lost, and to be honest is it really lost?
The answer is quite simple. 4.5386 trillion of our genes play a role in the final decision making. The final number of decisions that one can get out of a biological system is 65 sextillion decisions, none of them being unique except from the morphal coders and the anatomical bisectors that tend to produce unique behaviors
Text Corrected by Annliss-Gessaouaoron Ertivelliss of Canister Systems, Sweden.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)